|
Arizona: State Legislaure Considers Pro-Life LegislationSource: The Arizona Republic, Feb. 23, 1999 Phoenix -- A bill that would require abortion practitioners to inform women of the risks of having an abortion won preliminary approval Monday rom the state Senate despite concerns that it would be an unfunded mandate. The informed-consent abortion measure, Senate Bill 1343, was approved by a 15-12 vote. It still needs a final Senate vote before being sent to the House. The bill, similar to measures that have failed in the past two years, would require abortion practitioners to provide mothers with information about the physical and emotional risks of abortion. The information could be given either in person or over the telephone. After receiving such information, women would have to wait 24 hours before having an abortion. Sen. Ken Bennett (R) the bill's sponsor, said the legislation "has to do with making sure that the women of this state get the information they need to make a more informed choice." Meanwhile, an Arizona House panel has endorsed icensing of abortion facilities. Currently, Arizona only monitors facilities where patients stay overnight or get general anesthesia. A panel formed to look at regulation decided to focus only on abortion facilities because the issue was already a powder keg. The House convened the committee after reports of a woman who bled to death at a central Phoenix abortion facility in April. The abortion facility was also the site of a near-abortion in June that involved a woman 37 weeks along. The abortion ended up being a delivery. The baby's skull was permanently scarred, and late last week the family who adopted the baby filed a suit against Dr. John Biskind, claiming he was careless and negligent when he attempted the abortion. The bill that passed Tuesday, which would impose abortion facility licensing by April 1, 2000, could be a model for future regulations of all abortion facilities. In addition to laying down rules concerning equipment, procedures and employees, the measure also requires abortion practitioners to submit fetal tissues to the state health labs. The lab would check the fetal age. In the near-abortion, the abortion practitioner was working off an incorrect ultrasound performed by staf at the abortion facility that said the woman was about 23.6 weeks into her pregnancy. She was actually 37 weeks along, according to police reports. The fetal testing will affect only hundreds of the 11,000 abortions that are done in the state annually, said Rep. Susan Gerard, R-north Phoenix, head of the House health committee. Pro-abortion groups questioned the pro-life provision requiring those who perform abortions to have hospital privileges. Pro-life advocates sought the additional protections because abortion practitioners routinely maim women in abortions and do not conduct proper post-abortion follow-up. For More information Contact: Arizona Right to Life 77 E. Columbus Ave. Suite 209 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Phone: (602)285-0063 |
|
Florida:
Legislature Prepares for Pro-Life BillsTallahassee -- After pro-life gains in the 1998 elections, pro-life legislation vetoed last year by former Gov. Lawton Chiles (D) stands a better chance with pro-life Gov. Jeb Bush (R). Several "hot-button" issues of the Chiles administration -- "Choose Life" specialty license plates, a ban on partial-birth abortions and a parental notification clause -- are "heading for the 1999 Legislature," the Miami Herald reports. Calling the Bush administration "a new horizon," Christian Coalition of Florida Director John Dowless said the governor is "very friendly" to pro-life groups. Matt Ozolnieks, vice president of Florida Right to Life, agreed, indicating that such legislation has an "outstanding" shot at passing this year. While the license plate and the parental notification bills are expected to sail through the Legislature and receive Bush's nod, the bill to ban partial-birth abortion could encounter roadblocks. The Herald reports that a similar bill that passed the Legislature in 1997 "remains in limbo while the Florida Supreme Court considers its constitutionality." The new version of the bill has "been rewritten to address the legal concerns raised by the court," and state Rep. Tom Feeney (R) predicted the bill will again enjoy "overwhelmin[g]" support (Driscoll, Miami Herald, 2/23). For More Information Contact: Florida Right to Life 3336 Edgewater Drive Orlando, FL 32804 Phone: (407) 422-7111 Email: frtl@gdi.net, Web: http://www.frtl.org
|
|
Indiana:
Abortion Practitioner Faces Malpractice ChargesPress advisory |
This page is reformatted and published by Christ's Faithful People from the News Letters of Steven Ertelt of Pro-Life InfoNet.
The Pro-Life Infonet is a daily compilation of
pro-life news and
educational information. To subscribe, send the message "subscribe" to:
infonet-list-request@lists.prolife.org.
Infonet is sponsored by Women and
Children First (http://www.prolife.org/wcf). For
more pro-life info visit
the Ultimate Pro-Life Resource List at http://www.prolife.org/ultimate
and
for questions or additional information email ertelt@prolife.org